EMAIL: PASSWORD:
Front Office
UPT. PERPUSTAKAAN
Universitas Esa Unggul


Kampus Emas UEU - Jakarta Barat

Phone : 021-5674223, ext 282
Fax :
E-mail : [email protected]
Website : http://library.esaunggul.ac.id

Support (Customer Service) :
[email protected]








Welcome..guys!

Have a problem with your access?
Please, contact our technical support below:
LIVE SUPPORT


Astrid Chrisafi




! ATTENTION !

To facilitate the activation process, please fill out the member application form correctly and completely
Registration activation of our members will process up to max 24 hours (confirm by email). Please wait patiently

Still Confuse?
Please read our User Guide

Keyword
Mode
Expanded Search (for Free text search only)
 

UEU » Master Theses » Magister Hukum
Posted by [email protected] at 21/06/2022 14:50:44  •  109 Views


ANALISIS YURIDIS AGEN ASURANSI PERSEORANGAN BUKAN PEKERJA PENERIMA UPAH (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 467 K/PDT.SUS-PHI/2015)

Created by :
Ardiyanto ( 20190402041 )



SubjectYURIDIS
ASURANSI PERSEORANGAN
PEKERJA
Alt. Subject JURISDICTION
INDIVIDUAL INSURANCE
WORKERS
KeywordWorkers
Insurance Agents
Court of Industrial Relations
Supreme Court

Description:

In Indonesian labor laws, an employment relationship is defined as the existence of work, wages, and orders. Likewise, individual insurance agents should be classified as workers under the Manpower Act rather than Civil or Insurance Law. Because, in practice, insurance companies still treat an individual insurance agent as a work/business partner who receives a commission if the insurance product is sold, rather than a waged employee. As a result, it is questionable whether the Insurance Agent is an employee of an insurance business subject to Employment Law or a Business / Work Partner subject to Civil Law, given that the workload that must be completed is similar to that of workers employed by employers in general. The author finds examples of actual cases involving the status of insurance agents in insurance companies, such as industrial relations disputes at the Kupang District Court No.01/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2015/PN.KPG in the case between PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Jasindo) and the heirs of Mr. Nikolaus Djeramu (late), in which the panel of judges at the industrial relations court decided that the Insurance Agent is a worker who receives a wage and When the verdict was appealed to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, the decision was overturned by case decision number 467 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2015, which determined that the Insurance Agent is a Business / Work Partner in the Company Insurance and not a Wage Recipient Employee. As a result, the legal considerations of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Panel of Judges in deciding the case between PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Jasindo) and the Heirs of Mr. Nikolaus Djeramu (late) Case No. 467 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2015, which issued a decision with permanent legal force that the Insurance Agent is a Work Partner and not a wage earner, has become a source. Based on this data and supplemented by a real-life instance involving the status of a single insurance agent in an insurance firm. The case is presented in the form of research by the author. This is a legal research project that takes a statutory, conceptual, and case-based approach. The resources were gathered using the literature study method, which included both primary and secondary legal materials. In addition, the legal material is examined and analyzed using the methods employed in this study to address the legal concerns at hand

Contributor:
  1. Prof. Dr. Hendra Tanu Atmadja, SH., Drs., M.HUM., MIP., LL.M.,
Date Create:21/06/2022
Type:Text
Format:PDF
Language:Indonesian
Identifier:UEU-Master-20190402041
Collection ID:20190402041


Source :
Master Theses of Law

Relation Collection:
Fakultas Hukum

Coverage :
Civitas Akademika Universitas Esa Unggul

Rights :
@2022 Perpustakaan Universitas Esa Unggul


Publication URL :
https://digilib.esaunggul.ac.id/analisis-yuridis-agen-asuransi-perseorangan-bukan-pekerja-penerima-upah-studi-kasus-putusan-mahkamah-agungno-467-kpdtsusphi2015-25725.html




[ Free Download - Free for All ]

  1.  UEU-Master-25725-COVER.Image.Marked.pdf - 132 KB
  2.  UEU-Master-25725-HALAMAN PENGESAHAN.Image.Marked.pdf - 300 KB
  3.  UEU-Master-25725-HALAMAN KEASLIAN.Image.Marked.pdf - 367 KB
  4.  UEU-Master-25725-ABSTRAK.Image.Marked.pdf - 175 KB
  5.  UEU-Master-25725-KATA PENGANTAR.Image.Marked.pdf - 196 KB
  6.  UEU-Master-25725-DAFTAR ISI.Image.Marked.pdf - 228 KB
  7.  UEU-Master-25725-DAFTAR PUSTAKA.Image.Marked.pdf - 249 KB
  8.  UEU-Master-25725-BAB1.Image.Marked.pdf - 339 KB

[ FullText Content - Please, register first ]

  1. UEU-Master-25725-BAB2.Image.Marked.pdf - 457 KB
  2. UEU-Master-25725-BAB3.Image.Marked.pdf - 281 KB
  3. UEU-Master-25725-BAB4.Image.Marked.pdf - 489 KB
  4. UEU-Master-25725-BAB5.Image.Marked.pdf - 209 KB

 10 Similar Document...

     No similar subject found !

 10 Related Document...






HELP US !
You can help us to define the exact keyword for this document by clicking the link below :

Agents , Court , Court of Industrial Relations , Industrial , Insurance , Insurance Agents , Relations , Supreme , Supreme Court , Workers , of



POLLING

Bagaimana pendapat Anda tentang repository kami ?

Bagus Sekali
Baik
Biasa
Jelek
Mengecewakan




55885081


Visitors Today : 1
Total Visitor : 1963258

Hits Today : 23125
Total Hits : 55885081

Visitors Online: 1


Calculated since
16 May 2012

You are connected from 172.17.121.29
using CCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/)


UEU Digital Repository Feeds


Copyright © UEU Library 2012 - 2022 - All rights reserved.
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative and OpenArchives Compatible
Developed by Hassan