COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY AND MOTOR RELEARNING PROGRAMME IN POST STROKE PATIENTS

UPT. PERPUSTAKAAN Universitas Esa Unggul Kampus Emas UEU - Jakarta Barat
Phone	:	021-5674223, ext 282
Fax	:
E-mail	:	[email protected]
Website	:	http://library.esaunggul.ac.id
Support (Customer Service) :
[email protected]

Welcome..guys!

Have a problem with your access?
Please, contact our technical support below:

LIVE SUPPORT

Astrid Chrisafi

! ATTENTION !

To facilitate the activation process, please fill out the member application form correctly and completely

Registration activation of our members will process up to max 24 hours (confirm by email). Please wait patiently

Still Confuse?
Please read our User Guide

UEU » Proceeding » Fisioterapi
Posted by [email protected] at 18/04/2022 13:36:33 • 393 Views

COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY AND MOTOR RELEARNING PROGRAMME IN POST STROKE PATIENTS

Created by :
Jerry Maratis ( 0317087705 )
Ahmad Wahidin (20160606007), Kesit Ivanali (0323049402)

Subject:	TERAPI PASIEN SETELAH STROKE
Alt. Subject :	THERAPY POST STROKE PATIENT
Keyword:	CIMT MRP Upper Extremity Stroke

Description:

Compare the effectiveness of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and Motor Relearning Program (MRP) on upper extremity and hand functions in post-stroke patients.. Methods: This research is an experimental study design. randomaized control pre test post-Test Design. Sample of convenience of twelve (12) stroke subjects are selected and devided into group I and group II. Group I received CIMT and group II with MRP. Results: test normality with Shapiro Wilk Test obtained normal distribution data while with test homogenity with Levenes test obtained data has variant Homogen. The results of hypothesis testing in treatment group I with the One Sampels T-test obtained pvalue <0.001 in Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) CIMT intervention can improve Upper Etremity function. In the treatment group II with the One Sampels T-test, the pvalue was <0.001 at WMFT. So it can be concluded that MRP intervention can improve Upper Extremity function. The independent sample t-test results show a p-value <0.360, which means there is no difference in the functional increase in Upper Extremity Stroke conditions between CIMT and MRP interventions. Conclusion: there was no difference in effectiveness between CIMT and MRP for improving upper extremity function in post stroke patients.

Date Create	:	18/04/2022
Type	:	Text
Format	:	pdf
Language	:	English
Identifier	:	UEU-Proceeding-14_0257
Collection ID	:	14_0257

Source :
2021: Academic Physiotherapy Conference Proceeding

Relation Collection:
Fakultas Fisioterapi

Coverage :
Civitas Akademika Universitas Esa Unggul

Rights :
@2022 Perpustakaan Universitas Esa Unggul

Publication URL :
https://digilib.esaunggul.ac.id/compare-the-effectiveness-of-constraint-induced-movement-therapy-and-motor-relearning-programme-in-post-stroke-patients-24759.html

[ Free Download - Free for All ]