EMAIL: PASSWORD:
Front Office
UPT. PERPUSTAKAAN
Universitas Esa Unggul


Kampus Emas UEU - Jakarta Barat

Phone : 021-5674223, ext 282
Fax :
E-mail : [email protected]
Website : http://library.esaunggul.ac.id

Support (Customer Service) :
[email protected]








Welcome..guys!

Have a problem with your access?
Please, contact our technical support below:
LIVE SUPPORT


Astrid Chrisafi




! ATTENTION !

To facilitate the activation process, please fill out the member application form correctly and completely
Registration activation of our members will process up to max 24 hours (confirm by email). Please wait patiently

Still Confuse?
Please read our User Guide

Keyword
Mode
Expanded Search (for Free text search only)
 

UEU » Proceeding » Fisioterapi
Posted by [email protected] at 18/04/2022 13:36:33  •  312 Views


COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY AND MOTOR RELEARNING PROGRAMME IN POST STROKE PATIENTS

Created by :
Jerry Maratis ( 0317087705 )
Ahmad Wahidin (20160606007), Kesit Ivanali (0323049402)



SubjectTERAPI
PASIEN SETELAH STROKE
Alt. Subject THERAPY
POST STROKE PATIENT
KeywordCIMT
MRP
Upper Extremity
Stroke

Description:

Compare the effectiveness of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and Motor Relearning Program (MRP) on upper extremity and hand functions in post-stroke patients.. Methods: This research is an experimental study design. randomaized control pre test post-Test Design. Sample of convenience of twelve (12) stroke subjects are selected and devided into group I and group II. Group I received CIMT and group II with MRP. Results: test normality with Shapiro Wilk Test obtained normal distribution data while with test homogenity with Levenes test obtained data has variant Homogen. The results of hypothesis testing in treatment group I with the One Sampels T-test obtained pvalue <0.001 in Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) CIMT intervention can improve Upper Etremity function. In the treatment group II with the One Sampels T-test, the pvalue was <0.001 at WMFT. So it can be concluded that MRP intervention can improve Upper Extremity function. The independent sample t-test results show a p-value <0.360, which means there is no difference in the functional increase in Upper Extremity Stroke conditions between CIMT and MRP interventions. Conclusion: there was no difference in effectiveness between CIMT and MRP for improving upper extremity function in post stroke patients.

Date Create:18/04/2022
Type:Text
Format:pdf
Language:English
Identifier:UEU-Proceeding-14_0257
Collection ID:14_0257


Source :
2021: Academic Physiotherapy Conference Proceeding

Relation Collection:
Fakultas Fisioterapi

Coverage :
Civitas Akademika Universitas Esa Unggul

Rights :
@2022 Perpustakaan Universitas Esa Unggul


Publication URL :
https://digilib.esaunggul.ac.id/compare-the-effectiveness-of-constraint-induced-movement-therapy-and-motor-relearning-programme-in-post-stroke-patients-24759.html




[ Free Download - Free for All ]

  1.  UEU-Proceeding-24759-14_0257.pdf - 716 KB

[ FullText Content - Please, register first ]

...No Files...


[ Link of Contents]
  1. COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY AND MOTOR RELEARNING PROGRAMME IN POST STROKE PATIENTS
    https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/index.php/apc/article/view/112

 10 Similar Document...

     No similar subject found !

 10 Related Document...






HELP US !
You can help us to define the exact keyword for this document by clicking the link below :

CIMT , Extremity , MRP , Stroke , Upper , Upper Extremity



POLLING

Bagaimana pendapat Anda tentang repository kami ?

Bagus Sekali
Baik
Biasa
Jelek
Mengecewakan




124187052


Visitors Today : 1
Total Visitor : 1967720

Hits Today : 44856
Total Hits : 124187052

Visitors Online: 1


Calculated since
16 May 2012

You are connected from 172.17.121.29
using claudebot


UEU Digital Repository Feeds


Copyright © UEU Library 2012 - 2024 - All rights reserved.
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative and OpenArchives Compatible
Developed by Hassan