EMAIL: PASSWORD:
Front Office
UPT. PERPUSTAKAAN
Universitas Esa Unggul


Kampus Emas UEU - Jakarta Barat

Phone : 021-5674223, ext 282
Fax :
E-mail : [email protected]
Website : http://library.esaunggul.ac.id

Support (Customer Service) :
[email protected]








Welcome..guys!

Have a problem with your access?
Please, contact our technical support below:
LIVE SUPPORT


Astrid Chrisafi




! ATTENTION !

To facilitate the activation process, please fill out the member application form correctly and completely
Registration activation of our members will process up to max 24 hours (confirm by email). Please wait patiently

Still Confuse?
Please read our User Guide

Keyword
Mode
Expanded Search (for Free text search only)
 

UEU » Journal » Hukum
Posted by [email protected] at 15/10/2021 10:28:00  •  244 Views


ANALISIS YURIDIS MENGENAI KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN TERHADAP KETERANGAN SAKSI YANG DIBACAKAN DALAM PROSES PERSIDANGAN PERKARA PIDANA

Created by :
Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna ( 0324016301 )



SubjectPEMBUKTIAN
SAKSI
Alt. Subject CRIMINAL
COURT
KeywordSIDANG
PIDANA

Description:

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana kekuatan pembuktian terhadap keterangan saksi yang dibacakan dalam proses persidangan perkara pidana di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Nomor Perkara (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat No. 1337/Pid.B/2012.PN.Jkt.Pst) Penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptif, karena penelitian ini adalah suatu penelitian ilmiah untuk menemukan kebenaran berdasarkan logika keilmuan dari sisi hukum yang bersifat deskriptif, pengumpulan bahan hukum dalam penelitian ini adalah studi kepustakaan dengan mengumpulkan bahan sekunder yang ada hubungannya dengan masalah yang akan diteliti yang digolongkan sesuai dengan katalogisasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Teknik analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan penulis adalah analisis bahan hukum secara metode deduksi. Berdasarkan penelitian dan analisis data yang telah dilakukan maka diperoleh hasil bahwa proses pembuktian pada prinsipnya menganut adanya keharusan menghadirkan saksi-saksi di persidangan Pasal 185 ayat (1) KUHAP, akan tetapi hal tersebut bukanlah hal yang mutlak. Saksi yang tidak dapat hadir dalam proses persidangan, keterangannya boleh atau dapat disampaiakan di sidang pengadilan apa bila memenuhi salah satu alasan yang disebutkan dalam Pasal 162 ayat (1) KUHAP. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan memberi dasar dan landasan untukpenelitian lebih lanjut serta memberikan sumbangan pengetahuan dan pemikiranyang bermanfaat bagi pembangunan ilmu hukum khususnya Hukum Acara Pidanadan mempraktikkannya di lapangan. Manfaat praktisnya adalah dapat memberikandata dan informasi mengenai putusan hakim Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta. Hasil penelitian ini pun dapat menjadikan referensi dalam penjatuhan sanksi sesuai


Alt. Description

This study aims to find out how the power of proof of the testimony of witnesses who were read in the trial of a criminal case in the Jakarta District Court Case Number (Study of the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court No. 1337 / Pid.B / 2012.PN.Jkt.Pst) This research is a type of normative legal research that is descriptive, because this research is a scientific research to find out the truth based on the scientific logic of the legal nature that is descriptive, the collection of legal material in this study is the study of literature by collecting secondary material that has to do with the problem will be examined which are classified according to cataloging. This study uses a regulatory approach and a case approach. The legal material analysis technique used by the author is the analysis of legal materials by deduction method. Based on the research and data analysis that has been carried out, the results show that the proof process in principle adheres to the necessity to present witnesses in Article 185 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, but this is not an absolute matter. Witnesses who cannot be present in the trial process, their testimony may or may not be conveyed in what court session if they fulfill one of the reasons stated in Article 162 paragraph (1) KUHAP. The results of this study are expected to provide a basis and foundation forfurther research and contribute to knowledge and thoughtwhich is beneficial for the development of legal science, especially Criminal Procedure Lawand practice it in the field. The practical benefit is being able to providedata and information regarding the decisions of Surakarta District Court judges. Resultsthis research can also make references in imposing appropriate sanctions.

Date Create:15/10/2021
Type:Text
Format:pdf
Language:Indonesian
Identifier:UEU-Journal-11_1948
Collection ID:11_1948


Source :
Lex Jurnalica Volume 15 Nomor 3 Desember 2018

Relation Collection:
Fakultas Hukum

Coverage :
Civitas Akademika Universitas Esa Unggul

Rights :
@2021 Perpustakaan Universitas Esa Unggul


Publication URL :
https://digilib.esaunggul.ac.id/analisis-yuridis-mengenai-kekuatan-pembuktian-terhadap-keterangan-saksi-yang-dibacakan-dalam-proses-persidangan-perkara-pidana-22114.html




[ Free Download - Free for All ]

  1.  UEU-Journal-22114-11_1948.pdf - 512 KB

[ FullText Content - Please, register first ]

...No Files...

 10 Similar Document...

     No similar subject found !

 10 Related Document...






HELP US !
You can help us to define the exact keyword for this document by clicking the link below :

PIDANA , SIDANG



POLLING

Bagaimana pendapat Anda tentang repository kami ?

Bagus Sekali
Baik
Biasa
Jelek
Mengecewakan




159434884


Visitors Today : 1
Total Visitor : 1970152

Hits Today : 11476
Total Hits : 159434884

Visitors Online: 1


Calculated since
16 May 2012

You are connected from 172.17.121.29
using Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; [email protected])


UEU Digital Repository Feeds


Copyright © UEU Library 2012 - 2025 - All rights reserved.
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative and OpenArchives Compatible
Developed by Hassan