CAUSALITY TEACHING APPLICATION ON CRIMINAL ACTIONS DUE TO DEATH CASE IN HOSPITAL OVER DECISION OF SUPREME COURT INDONESIA REPUBLIC NO. 1110 K/PID.SUS/2012

Health services basically aim to carry out efforts to prevent and treat a disease, including medical services based on an individual relationship between a doctor and a patient. Doctors are parties who have expertise in the medical field who are considered to have the ability and expertise to perform medical actions. Meanwhile, patients are sick people who are common with their illness and entrust themselves to be treated and cured by doctors. Therefore, doctors are obliged to provide the best possible medical service for patients. But in medical services there are times when it doesnt work and the patient is pronounced dead. This phenomenon can lead to prosecution of the doctor or other health personnel for the death of the patient. This research was conducted to find out how the application of causality teaching in criminal acts that resulted in the death of patients due to medical action. In addition, this research also conducted to find out how the application of causality teaching to crimes that caused death in the Supreme Court Decision Number 1110 K / Pid.Sus / 2012. To examine this, the author uses a normative legal research method and uses a statutory approach by referring to the applicable legal rules. Based on the results of the research it was found that the public prosecutors, judges and legal advisors in seeing a case had different points of view. The public prosecutors saw the defendants mistakes from all aspects by using the teaching of causality condition sine qua non, while from the point of view of the legal advisor as a defence the teaching of causality objective generalization and the judge as a case breaker uses the teaching of causality novus actus interveniens.

1.  UEU-Journal-22405-11_2016.pdf - 471 KB

1. CAUSALITY TEACHING APPLICATION ON CRIMINAL ACTIONS DUE TO DEATH CASE IN HOSPITAL OVER DECISION OF SUPREME COURT INDONESIA REPUBLIC NO. 1110 K/PID.SUS/2012
   http://www.kemalapublisher.com/index.php/JoMA/article/view/600

• ABORTUS PROVOKATUS DALAM PERSEPEKTIF HUKUM KESEHATAN DI INDONESIA ( STUDI KASUS PERKARA NO.78/PID./1998/PN.JKT.PST)
• PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PASIEN SEBAGAI KONSUMEN JASA PELAYANAN KESEHATAN DALAM TRANSAKSI TERAPEUTIK
• TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAKAN DOKTER YANG TIDAK MEMBERIKAN HASIL DIAGNOSA KEPADA PASIEN (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Medan Nomor 33/PDT/2015/PT-MDN)
• PENANGANAN PASIEN GAWAT DARURAT YANG DI RUJUK KE RUMAH SAKIT PERMATA HIJAU BERDASARKAN UNDANG � UNDANG NOMOR 36 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KESEHATAN ( STUDI KASUS PASIEN KELUARGA BAPAK NANA )
• PERAN PETUGAS BPJS DIRSUD CENGKARENG BERDASARKAN UNDANGUNDANG BPJS
• LAPORAN KEGIATAN PERKULIAHAN ETIKA DAN HUKUM KESEHATAN
• LAPORAN KEGIATAN PERKULIAHAN HUKUM KESEHATAN (KJ001) SEMESTER GENAP 2020-2021
• LAPORAN KEGIATAN PERKULIAHAN HUKUM KESEHATAN (KJ201) SEMESTER GENAP 2020-2021
• THE IMPLEMENTATION EFFECTIVENESS OF HOSPITAL RESPONSIBILITY TOWARDS MEDICAL DISPUTE PROCESS AT HOSPITAL X CIBINONG
• TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAKAN DOKTER YANG TIDAK MEMBERIKAN HASIL DIAGNOSA KEPADA PASIEN