Universitas Esa Unggul
Kampus Emas UEU - Jakarta Barat
021-5674223, ext 282
Support (Customer Service) :
Have a problem with your access?|
Please, contact our technical support below:
! ATTENTION !
To facilitate the activation process, please fill out the member application form correctly and completely
Registration activation of our members will process up to max 24 hours (confirm by email). Please wait patiently
Please read our User Guide
UEU » Scientific Articles » Hukum
Posted by [email protected] at 07/02/2020 11:36:10 • 447 Views
PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP HAK KONSUMEN TERKAIT PENARIKAN PAKSA KENDARAAN BERMOTOR AKIBAT KREDIT MACET (ANALISA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 571 K/PDT.SUS-BPSK/2017)Created by :
Cindy Adriana ( None )
Rizka Amelia Azis
|Subject: ||HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN|
|Alt. Subject : ||CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW|
|Keyword: ||DEBT COLECTOR|
In several regions of Indonesia there are still often cases of forced withdrawal of a consumer of a motor
vehicle purchased on credit through an agreement and the motorized vehicle has been charged with
fiduciary security. Forced withdrawal of motorized vehicles by business actors, but what happened was that
business actors used the services of a debt collectot. The procedures performed at the time of withdrawal or
execution of fiduciary collateral items are not in accordance with the regulations in force in Indonesia.
Therefore, this paper aims to determine the rights of consumers related to forced withdrawals and determine
the impact on business actors for acts of execution that deviate from the legislation. This research uses
normative juridical type of research method which is qualitative in nature. The result of this writing is that
the rights of consumers as regulated in Article 4 of the Consumer Protection Act have been violated by
business actors, as well as violating the procedure for executing objects that are subject to fiduciary security
as regulated in Article 29 of the Fiduciary Guarantee Act. The impact that will be received on business
actors in the form of warning sanctions, freezing of business activities and revocation of business licenses.
The sanctions were given by the Minister of Finance based on Minister of Finance Regulation Number 130 /
PMK.010 / 2012 and Minister of Finance Regulation Number 84 / PMK.012 / 2006.
|Date Create||:||07/02/2020 |
Civitas Akademika Universitas Esa Unggul
@2020 Perpustakaan Universitas Esa Unggul
Publication URL :
[ Free Download - Free for All ]
- UEU-Article-14481-5_0207.pdf - 475 KB
[ FullText Content - Please, register first ]
10 Similar Document...
No similar subject found !
10 Related Document...
POLLINGBagaimana pendapat Anda tentang repository kami ?
Visitors Today : 1
Total Visitor : 1963321
Hits Today : 2741
Total Hits : 58551318
Visitors Online: 1
16 May 2012
You are connected from 172.17.121.29
using CCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/)